THE TRUTH ABOUT HOMEOPATHY
26th May, 2008.
Dispelling the MYTHS that Surround it!
by Louise Mclean, Editor, Zeus Information Service.
In this article, I would like to dispel a plethora of myths surrounding homeopathy which have been used to discredit
this highly efficacious healing art and science. Homeopaths are given few opportunities in the media to defend their
profession, so a lot of misconceptions abound. The medical profession in general presents a fierce and blinkered
opposition, yet as Big Pharma is learning of all sorts of amazing cured cases, they are determined to stamp out
competition via EU regulation.
Myth No. 1 - Homeopathic medicines cure nothing.
Homeopathy works by stimulating the body's OWN healing mechanisms, through like for like. A substance that would cause
symptoms in a healthy person can be used to cure the same symptoms in a sick person by giving a minute, highly
potentised dose of that substance acting as a catalyst to jump start their own healing mechanisms. Everyone of us has
our own natural innate healing powers. All that is needed is the correct stimulus to kick start it. In healthy people
this may just be rest and good food but many people become 'stuck' in their physical, emotional or mental illness and
cannot recover. Of course there are different levels of health and the choice of potency given should reflect that.
Low potencies are given for very physically ill people and higher for those whose problems are emotional or of the
mind. Homeopathy is very successful in treating emotional problems such as stress, anxiety and fears.
Myth No 2 - Homeopathic medicines are just water.
Homeopathic medicines are NOT made using only dilution. Dilution alone would do nothing whatsoever. Many homeopaths
are getting tired of reading this highly inaccurate reporting in the media. All homeopathic medicines are made by a
process of dilution and SUCCUSSION (potentisation through vigorous shaking - 100 shakes between each potency - i.e.
between a 1c and a 2c, between a 2c and a 3c potency, between a 3c and a 4c, etc. etc.) Most homeopathic medicines can
be bought in either 6c or 30c from Boots or from health shops. Higher potencies of 200c and 1m (1000c) can be obtained
only from homeopathic pharmacies. Succussion is nowadays done by machines, originally by hand. Succussion brings out
the formative intelligence of the substance and imprints it upon the 60% distilled water + 40% alcohol medium used to
make homeopathic medicines - alcohol acting as a preservative.
Myth No. 3 - homeopathic medicines are unscientific.
Homeopathic medicines undergo a scientific 'Proving' where a control group of 50+ healthy volunteers ('Provers') are
instructed to keep taking a remedy under trial until they develop symptoms which they must record in detail.
Substances that have been rigorously tested include nearly everything on the Periodic Table - metals, minerals and
gases as well as plants and even things like snake venom.
The Provers are given a bottle of a new remedy being tested in the 30c potency and must keep taking it until they
develop symptoms, which must be carefully recorded and then submitted to a database. The Provers must be healthy and
symptom-free to start with so that the symptoms they experience are new ones CAUSED by the remedy.
They must keep a careful daily note of what happens and not discuss it with any of the other Provers. Whatever
symptoms the Provers all experienced in common become the black type symptoms of the remedy which are then added to
the Materia Medica of homeopathic medicines and Homeopathic Repertory (encyclopedia of symptoms). Thus the curative
indications of a remedy are obtained for clinical use.
Symptoms have also been obtained through historical records of accidental poisonings, such as Arsenic and Belladonna.
For example, poisoning by Arsenic causes vomitting, diarrhoea, restlessness, anxiety and extreme chill. Therefore you
might get a patient in this state (possibly after food poisoning) and Arsenicum in a homepathic tablet will quickly
There are more than 4,000+ homeopathic medicines including nearly everything on the periodic table. But of course all
of the remedies tested have been diluted and succussed (potentised), so they are not toxic like modern drugs.
The Homeopathic Materia Medica and Repertory are extremely large books or divided into volumes. The Repertory is
divided into sections in this order: Mind, Vertigo, Head, Eye, Vision, Ear, Hearing, Nose, Face, Mouth, Teeth, Throat,
External Throat, Stomach, Abdomen, Rectum, Stool, Bladder, Kidney, Prostate Gland, Urethra, Urine, Male, Female,
Larynx, Respiration, Cough, Expectoration, Chest, Back, Extremities, Sleep, Dreams, Chill, Fever, Perspiration, Skin,
Generals. Obviously some sections are bigger than others!
In the various Repertories, remedies are listed alongside the full range of symptoms (rubrics) in abbreviated form -
all information being systematically taken from Provings and clinical practice. Every human state of mind, emotions
and body is listed. Symptoms that would mean nothing to a medical doctor can be looked up and the curative remedy
found in these huge book. Homeopathy is a study of human nature, endlessly fascinating and how negative states of
mind and emotions affect the physical body culminating in illness. Nowadays many homeopaths use computer software
programmes which contain all this information.
Myth No. 4 - homeopathic practitioners receive inadequate training.
In fact all qualified homeopathic practitioners undergo a four year training course at accredited Colleges, which
includes Anatomy and Physiology, as well as Pathology and Disease, Materia Medica, Homeopathic Philosophy and study of
the Homeopathic Repertory. Yet medical doctors and nurses treat after much shorter homeopathy courses. To be really
good, you need to study intensively for about 10 years. Homeopathy is a lifetime's work and you never stop learning.
Myth No. 5 - there are no studies that prove homeopathy works
In the past 24 years there have been more than 180 controlled, and 118 randomized, trials into homeopathy, which were
analysed by four separate meta-analyses. In each case, the researchers concluded that the benefits of homeopathy went
far beyond that which could be explained purely by the placebo effect. Another meta-analysis found that 65 of the 89
trials analysed had produced an effect way beyond placebo (source WDDTY -
A study of 6500 patients at the Bristol Homeopathic hospital was conducted showing that over 70% of patients reported
complete cure or significant improvement of their symptoms.
A study on the properties of water was performed by Dr. Rustrum Roy. This paper provides an interdisciplinary base of
information on the structure of liquid water.
The Structure Of Liquid Water; Novel Insights From Materials Research; Potential Relevance To Homeopathy
Rustum Roy1, W.A. Tiller2, Iris Bell3, M. R. Hoover4
Received: 2 August 2004 Revised: 6 September 2004 Accepted: 14
Homeopathy can never be tested properly through conventional trials because each prescription is individualised as
every person is unique. Therefore 10 people with arthritis, for example, may all need a different homeopathic
medicine. So it is far from ideal to follow the allopathic trial paradigm to test homeopathy. In orthodox medicine
trials, all are given the same medicine to be tested. In homeopathy all may be given different medicines!
Anybody who has an understanding of the principles of homeopathy can be left in no doubt that we are dealing with a
scientific therapeutic method in the best possible sense: it is based on observation, facts and phenomena and follows
the rules of inductive logic that can be tested in daily practice. It is a comprehensive and comprehensible mode of
therapy, which in some countries is first line treatment for the whole range of acute and chronic conditions. It has
been proven abundantly that it is superior in the treatment of epidemic diseases to allopathy.
It is amazing how people, who like to see themselves on the side of unprejudiced evaluation, can be so blinkered.
People pass judgment on homeopathy who have never bothered to study it. Like any science it takes time to learn
(especially to learn it correctly) and years of practice to master but the rewards for patients, practitioners and the
NHS purse are great. Before those who preach pure science come down on therapies like homeopathy too heavily, they
should ask themselves how many of the accepted treatments within the NHS have a scientific evidence base?
With every homeopathic medicine we know exactly the substance it was made from, unlike most modern drugs where we have
no clue of the ingredients. This is ironic too as ALL natural health products, whether vitamin, mineral or food
supplement must clearly state on the label every single ingredient. When we go to the supermarket or health food shop,
we hold up the packet or bottle and read what is in the product, yet people happily swallow prescription drugs with no
idea whatsoever what they have taken! They could contain cyanide or any poison and the patient would be none the wiser.
With the new class of genetically modified drugs, such as the one used in the Northwick Park drug trial in London, the
dangers of a massive allergic reaction, such as the drug testers experienced, are even greater.
Those, who claim to be scientists, should have the ability to at least try to understand different paradigms. If not,
they look more like people who have settled on a comfortable view of the world which might soon look very outmoded
indeed. As the great musician and conductor Sir Yehudi Menhuin once said: 'Homeopathy is one of the few specialised
areas in medicine, which carries no disadvantages but only advantages.
Regarding the Horizon programme on homeopathy, Prof. Madeleine Ennis was not involved in the Horizon test. The test
was carried out by Wayne Turnbull at Guys hospital, London. It has been conceded that the Horizon test was not an
exact replica of Ennis' successful trials. Many of his protocols were different. You can read at this link where he
added in an ammonium chloride lysis step which would have ended up killing the very basophils that were such an
integral part of the test.
Ennis' original test was replicated in 4 different labs in 4 different countries.
Dr. Peter Fisher's article in PubMed discusses the 'End of Homeopathy' editorial and meta-analysis published in the
Lancet of 26th August 2005 and how nearly 100 successful studies that showed homeopathy worked were thrown out and
only a few that were inconclusive were used. Dr. Fisher is the Queen's homeopathic physician and heads the Royal
London Homeopathic Hospital. (The vitriolic editorial was caused by the World Health Organisation bringing out a draft
report in 2005 which was favourable towards homeopathy!)
"The final analysis which concluded that 'the clinical effects of homoeopathy are placebo effects' was based on just
eight clinical trials of homeopathy. The Lancet's press release did not mention this, instead giving the impression
that the conclusions were based on all 110 trials." "One of the most serious criticisms is the complete lack of
transparency: we have no idea which eight trials were included in the final, damning, analysis." "The literature
references are not given, nor any information on the diagnoses, numbers of patients, etc., nor can these be deduced
from the article. Prof. Egger has refused several requests to disclose the identity of the eight trials. This is not
even a matter of scientific method, but of natural justice: the accused has the right to know the evidence against him."
"The Lancet meta-analysis in 2005 of homeopathic trials was said to be based upon 110 placebo-controlled clinical
trials of homeopathy and 110 clinical trials of allopathy, which were said to be matched but were in fact reduced to
21 trials of homeopathy and 9 of conventional medicine and further reduced to 8 and 6 trials."
Other Responses from the Homeopathic Community on the Lancet Article
George Vithoulkas' 'Science of Homeopathy' is still considered an excellent exposition of the science
More scientific studies:
Myth No. 6 - homeopathic hospitals are a waste of money
There are 5 homeopathic hospitals in the UK - in London, Liverpool, Tunbridge Wells, Bristol and Glasgow. They cost
the NHS about ? million a year. Compare that to the ?00 billion for the total 2008 annual NHS budget!! These
homeopathic hospitals SAVE money for the NHS as the Smallwood report commissioned by Prince Charles has demonstrated.
At one of the earliest debates on the NHS Act 1948 the Government pledged that homoeopathy would continue to be
available on the health service as long as there were "patients wishing to receive it and doctors willing to provide
it". Many people who depend upon it are alarmed at the possibility that Homeopathy may no longer be available on the
NHS. Since the passing of the NHS Act in 1948, a provision has always been made for people to be treated at
homeopathic hospitals in the UK and until PCTs began to stop referring patients, there had indeed been long waiting
lists, some 6 months or more.
See this letter sent out to all Primary Care Trusts in 2006 signed by a group of professors hostile to homeopathy and
putting pressure on PCTs not to refer patients to the 5 homeopathic hospitals in the UK. They wrote the letter on NHS
Myth No. 7 - Cure with homeopathy is simply the Placebo Effect.
When Prince Charles treats his farm animals at Highgrove with homeopathic medicines do they know that a remedy has
been put in the water they drink? Farmers successfully use homeopathic medicines for their cows suffering from
mastitis. Does a tiny baby know when their fever drops dramatically using Belladonna or Aconite, that they have been
given a homeopathic medicine?! As anyone who has treated animals and babies with homoepathic medicines will tell you,
homeopathy works even better on animals and babies than it does on adults! If proof were needed, this is it. Not
Perhaps the most striking research on homeopathy that goes some way to debunking the placebo argument is when
homeopathic remedies are tested on live tissue in a petri dish or studies involving animals (mice in this case)
Myth No. 8 - homeopathic medicines contain no molecules
Any remedy under a 12c or a 24x potency still contains the original molecules of the substance and this is known as
Avogadro's number. These low potencies are most suitable for physical illness of long duration as well as to heal
specific organs that are not functioning properly.
Myth No. 9 - 'Anecdotal Evidence' does not constitute scientific evidence!
Most medical, surgical procedures and drug usage are not backed by studies - only by anecdotal evidence. According to
the US Government's Office of Technology Assessment (Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment:
Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1978), only
10-20% of all medical procedures and off-label drug usage are backed by clinical studies.
Strong anecdotal evidence among informed professionals is actually quite reliable - at least as reliable as clinical
Many clinical tests come to diametrically opposed conclusions. You could say that the problem was discovered through
anecdotal evidence - and merely confirmed through a peer reviewed study.
The problem isn't with the use of anecdotal evidence. It's with the double standard applied by the establishment
(medical and regulatory) that holds complementary medicine to an absurdly higher standard, allowing medical doctors to
do pretty much whatever they want. If informed anecdotal evidence is allowable for 85% of all medical procedure and
drug usage, why is alternative health held to an impossible 0% standard?
Millions of people worldwide testify that homeopathy cures their illnesses yet apparently that cannot be construed as
If a person were to walk out of their house to the town centre and witness someone having their bag snatched or
witness a car accident, then when they relay this information to the Police or to their friends and family, it is
If someone go on holiday, stays at a nice hotel, eats delicious food, comes back home and relates the holiday to their
friends, that is anecdotal evidence.
Does that mean that the above never happened? According to the detractors of complementary or alternative medicine,
yes it does!
Millions of people have been cured of their diseases or afflictions using homeopathy, herbs, healing, vitamin
supplements, special diets and on and on. Yet according to orthodox medicine all of these cures are anecdotal evidence
and as such do not merit any further investigation, study, or validity. As far as orthodox medicine is concerned,
these cures never happened.
Yet what if someone witnessed a car accident and the Police wanted them to make a statement? Would the statement in
court be dismissed as anecdotal evidence? Would the police, even if they arrived at the scene of the accident to find
the person still there comforting the passengers or trying to help, say they had not been there and their evidence is
non existent? I don't think so.
So how for so long have we put up with the top dogs in the medical establishment dismissing our cures as total
nonsense, figments of our imagination, placebo cures, or outright lies?
How when millions are cured around the world using homeopathic medicines, can these cures be dismissed as unworthy of
attention, simply 'anecdotal evidence'.
Orthodox medicine implies through this that all cures with alternative medicine are untrue or simply imagined. Even
when all the evidence is put before them, they become angry and even aggressive, simply refusing to see or to listen.
All the case notes in the surgery show that Mr. A had arthritis for 5 years, had been on anti-flammatory medicines,
yet after homeopathic treatment for 6 months, the arthritis is cured. The reaction of the doctor is either disbelief
or an attitude where they will not talk about it and do not want to know.
Of course there are some orthodox doctors who practise acupuncture, homeopathy or herbs themselves and who do believe
that these therapies cured the patient but they are in the small minority.
It is always the top cancer specialists and professors whose lives and vested interests are the most challenged by the
idea that anything other than pharmaceutical drugs or surgical interventions can cure the patient.
Yet pharmaceutical drugs cure nothing. They merely SUPPRESS the symptoms driving them deeper into the body of the
Hence the eczema patient whose skin symptoms have been suppressed, goes on to develop asthma. The arthritic patient
whose joint pains are suppressed, eventually will go on to develop heart disease.
The doctor makes no connection whatsoever that their drugs have created these deeper illnesses but just goes on to
give the patient more and more powerful drugs, making the patient sicker still. Then when they die, they say, 'We did
everything we could'. Yes and you killed the patient!
After homeopathic treatment, careful analysis is taken of the Direction of Cure of the patient's symptoms. Constance
Hering was a converted skeptic of homeopathy. As a young man in Germany in the early nineteenth century, Hering had
been assigned the task of reviewing Homeopathy because his medical mentor (a fervent anti-homeopath) had been asked by
a publisher to write a book exposing homeopathy as unworthy. Having been given this task, Hering conducted a detailed
study but concluded the opposite from the requested results! He was the first to talk about the Law of Cure which says
that symptoms are cured from above down, from the inside out and in the reverse order of their appearance. This has
stood the test of time in clinical experience. A simple example would be after a curative remedy is given for eczema
all over the body, we would see the eczema start to move down and when it is only on the ankles, we know it is nearly
The body is always intelligent. That is why the human race has survived. When a baby is conceived, Nature chooses the
best genes from both parents in order to create a stronger, healthier human. If the parents are both taking drugs of
any kind, whether legal or illegal, the health of the baby will be compromised.
If only doctors and scientists would study Nature, they would find all the answers and instead of going against it,
learn from it. There is only one true science and that is the science of Nature.
The human race has survived because we all have an innate healing power in our bodies. In homeopathy for example, this
is called the Vital Force. Homeopathy stimulates the vital force to heal the body, through like for like (using a
potentised substance that would cause the symptoms but in a tiny dose acts as a catalyst for healing).
So in conclusion, there is no question that dismissing cures as Anecdotal Evidence through the use of natural
medicine, is nothing more than a whitewash and a desperate means of suppressing the knowledge of those cures to the
public as a whole.
Hahnemann was a doctor but gave up his practice because he was appalled at the poisonous side effects of most available
medicine. He started experimenting and did something rather novel - he took some quinine, while perfectly healthy. He
observed that the effect on him was identical to a malarial attack: alternating fever with heat and chills. This is where
homeopathy started: a substance, given to a healthy individual, causes symptoms. If given to someone who suffers those
symptoms, it will thus neutralise the sickness.
After his observations on quinine, Hahnemann went on to test hundreds of substances on himself and willing, healthy
volunteers, used the tested substances for matching symptoms in his patients and all the while kept accounts of detailed
Of course, Hahnemann had an antecedent, still well-known today because all doctors still swear an oath to him to promise
best medical practice: Hippocrates. Hippocrates stated that there were two laws of healing - the law of opposites
(allopathy) and the law of similars (homeopathy). A Greek physician called Galen had laid these rules down in about 150 AD.
Homeopathic theories are based on fixed principles of the Laws of Nature which do not change - unlike medical theories
which are constantly changing! Homeopathy is both a science and an art.
Far from being ideas-based, this is completely evidence-based, empirical medicine an almost unique concept at the time.
After some years of practicing like this, Hahnemann was still not satisfied. The substances he was using, while more
effective than normal medical practice, were still having side effects. Or, if he reduced dosage too far, there was no
effect. This is when he developed the concept of potentisation, the serial dilution that opponents of homeopathy deride.
Treating the Whole Person or Holistic Healing
We are not just a collection of parts to be fixed as doctors treat us but ALWAYS operating as a whole person ALL of the
time. In other words medicines are chosen that treat the whole person and not just the part. This may seem strange to
grasp and yet doesn't it in fact make total sense? Do we leave our sore throat on the desk of the physician as we leave
the doctor's surgery? Or our arthritic knee behind. No, every single tiny function of our body operates as a WHOLE, all of
the time. You cannot treat one thing and not affect the rest. That is why pharma drugs are so dangerous as for example, in
treating a cancerous tumour, the medicine will affect and disturb the other systems of the body.
We are all energy beings.
The electricity in our bodies transmits messages to all parts/systems of the body. Illness is caused when these messages
are not getting through. All systems of the body are communicating with each other at all times. Water is a great
conductor of electricity and it transmits the electrical current. This is how homeopathic mediums work - by communicating
a current/pattern/frequency of energy via the whole human body to jump start the body's own inherent healing mechanisms.
Homeopathy treats different sorts of people with distinct characters and personalities as well as different physical looks
and natures. It individualises each person and looks at their symptoms AS A WHOLE.
Is it not true that no two people are alike? That every person is unique? This is why you could line up 20 people with
asthma and they might all need a different homeopathic medicine. There are in fact about 250 homeopathic medicines for
asthma but the correct one for each person must be selected taking into consideration such things as what makes the
condition better or worse, what time of day it comes on, whether the person is hot or cold, worse for damp, need fresh air
or prefer the windows closed and so on. You would be amazed how each person's symptoms are so different and yet they have
all been diagnosed with asthma.
If people want to improve their looks, homeopathy does just that. When you are healthy and well, you obviously look better!
Homeopathic practitioners believe in PREVENTION, having treatment can prevent illness rather than leaving it to the
surgeon's knife. There are thousands of homeopathic medicines which treat every ailment known to man, truly the most
wonderful science on this planet.
Many people buy self help books or think they can treat themselves with over the counter remedies. This is a short term
solution. The reason is as stated above. You cannot treat individual symptoms without taking into consideration the rest
of you! Only a qualified and experienced homeopath who will spend 1-2 hours taking your full medical history and all of
your symptoms can prescribe the remedy that fits best. In other words if you have hayfever, the homeopath will take into
consideration all other physical symptoms a as well as your personality, to come to the correct prescription. Itchy,
watery, red eyes, worse morning and evening would be Sulphur but only if all the other things about you fit the Sulphur
picture. You cannot prescribe for yourself as you cannot take all of it into consideration at once. So if for example you
buy Natrum Mur. for your hayfever (which is also an excellent remedy for this), it may work for a bit if you are healthy
but the hayfever will come back, will not be cured for good, because it was not the remedy that fitted best.
The only exception to this rule is in the treatment of first aid and even then it often has to be individualised. An
example of when it does not is having a molar removed at the dentist. Firstly you would take Arnica for bruising of the
gums, secondly Hypericum for the pain as the anaesthetic wears off (will remove pain completely), thirdly Ledum for
injection and fourthly Calendula (the remedy not the cream!) for fast healing of the gums (or any other injury). Symphytum
is the great healer of broken bones.
Homeopaths believe that illnesses manifest for three reasons: firstly they are genetically inherited from our parents,
grandparents, forefathers. Secondly, they can be caused by an traumatic event such as death of a loved one, divorce, job
loss - any event that has a serious impact upon the person. Thirdly they can be caused from drugs taken by our parents
(passed onto the foetus) or by ourselves. There is also of course accidents and injury.
Inherited disease can be traced back to one or more of what homeopaths call MIASMS - these are syphilis, gonorrhoea, psora
(scabies), tuberculosis and cancer. We are all a mix of all of these as especially TB, dates back thousands of years.
However one or more of the miasms is uppermost in a person and is an important aspect of the case-taking to determine the
So many people are in total ignorance of the VAST amount of study needed to become an expert in this field. Also there are
hundreds of homeopathic books only available at specialist bookshops, many printed in India where homeopathy is more
popular than orthodox medicine.
Attacks on Homeopathy
After the ever increasing attacks on alternative medicine in the media and in particular homeopathy, once again Professor
Edzard Ernst, the 'first professor of complementary medicine' (whose qualifications for the job are still in question)
discredits homeopathy. Yet in an interview with Geoff Watts in 2003
entitled 'A Scientist in the Alternative Camp', Professor Ernst stated:
"Our family doctor in the little village outside Munich where I grew up was a homoeopath. My mother swore by it. As a kid
I was treated homoeopathically. So this kind of medicine just came naturally. Even during my studies I pursued other
things like massage therapy and acupuncture."
"As a young doctor I had an appointment in a homoeopathic hospital, and I was very impressed with its success rate. My
boss told me that much of this success came from discontinuing mainstream medication. This made a big impression on me."
The truth is that homeopathy is getting ever more popular and the drugs companies are putting out their spin in overdrive
through their science and media PR operation outlets to counteract this in any way they can.
The reason there is this incessant assault in the press against homeopathy is because Pharma wields enormous power over
the media and because the popularity of homeopathy has been increasing due to side effects of modern medicine. Also,
unlike other natural therapies, it is pills and in direct competition.
At leat six million people use complementary treatments each year in the UK, which offers clinically-effective and
cost-effective solutions to common health problems faced by NHS patients.
In view of the highly inaccurate reporting and vitriolic attacks in the recent press coverage on homeopathy, I would like
to point out some little known historical facts concerning homeopathy.
The practice of homeopathic medicine flourished in both Europe and the US during the 1800s and early 1900s and was
spectacularly popular with European royalty and the British aristocracy, American entrepreneurs, literary giants, and
John D. Rockefeller referred to it as 'a progressive and aggressive step in medicine' and was under homeopathic care
throughout the latter part of his life living to 99 years of age. A strong advocate of homeopathy, major grants of between
$300-$400 million he intended for homeopathic institutions were instead used for orthodox medical institutions in the
early 1900s, under pressure from his son and his financial advisor, Frederick Gates. (Source Dana Ullman)
In the United States in the early 1900s there were 22 homeopathic medical schools and over 100 homeopathic hospitals, 60
orphanages and old people's homes and 1,000+ homeopathic pharmacies. Members of the American Medical Association had great
animosity towards homeopathy after its formation in 1847 and it was decided to purge all local medical societies of
physicians who were homeopaths. This purge was successful in every state except Massachusetts because homoepathy was so
strong among the elite of Boston.
The AMA wanted to keep homoepaths out of their societies and discourage any type of association with homeopaths. In 1855
the AMA established a code of ethics which stated that orthodox physicians would lose their membership if they even
consulted with a homeopath. If a physician lost his membership, it meant that in some States he no longer had a licence to
Drug companies were antagonistic towards homeopathy, collectively trying to suppress it. The medical journals they
published were used as mouthpieces against homeopathy and in support of orthodox medicine.
At an AMA meeting, a respected orthodox physician said: 'We must admit that we never fought the homeopath on matters of
principles; we fought him because he came into the community and got the business.' Economic issues played a major role in
what was allowed to be practised.
Homeopathy attracted support from many of the most respected members of society in the US, such as William James, Henry
Wadsworth Longfellow, Louisa M. Alcott, Mark Twain, former American Presidents James Garfield and William McKinley. In
Britain among its supporters were George Bernard Shaw, Charles Dickens, W.B. Yeats, William Thackarey, Benjamin Disraeli,
Yehudi Menuhin. Other famous supporters were Dostoevsky, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Mahatma Ghandi.
Nowadays, celebrities using and supporting homeopathy are many and include among others : Catherine Zeta-Jones, Tina
Turner, Whoopi Goldberg, Pamela Anderson, Jane Fonda, Cher, Rosie O'Donnell, Martin Sheen, the Chilli Peppers, Jane
Seymour, Lesley Anne Warren, Mariel Hemingway, Lindsay Wagner, Paul McCartney, Axl Rose, Linda Gray, Susan Blakely,
Michael Franks, Cybil Sheppard, Dizzy Gillespie, Vidal Sassoon, Angelica Houston, Boris Becker, Martina Navratilova,
David Beckham, Priscilla and Lisa Marie Presley, Cliff Robertson, Jerry Hall, Diane von Furstenberg, Ashley Judd, Naomi
Judd, Olivia Newton-John, Julianna Margulies, JD Salinger, Blythe Danner, Pat Riley (coach of the Miami Heat). The list of
famous people who supported homeopathy is endless.....
See 'The Homeopathic Revolution' by Dana Ullman MPH
The aristocratic patronage of homeopathy in the UK extending well into the 1940s and beyond can be easily demonstrated. In
the Homeopathic Medical Directories there are lists of patrons of the dispensaries and hospitals. They read like an
extract from Burke's or Debrett's.
(See A History of Homeopathy in Britain by Peter Morrell, Honorary Research Associate in the History of Medicine,
Staffordshire University, UK.)
Homeopathy is practised nowadays in countries all over the world and is especially popular in France, South America and
India where there are around 250,000 homeopathic doctors! In a recent Global TGI survey where people were asked whether
they trust homeopathy the following percentages of people living in urban areas said Yes: 62% in India, 58% Brazil, 53%
Saudi Arabia, Chile 49%, United Arab Emirates 49%, France 40%, South Africa 35%, Russia 28%, Germany 27%, Argentina 25%,
Hungary 25%, USA 18%, UK 15%.
Zeus Information Service
Alternative Views on Health
Copyright ?Louise Mclean 2008